Scott Simon is a genuine NPR personality. He lets you know who he is, where he’s coming from. It’s not just some reporter covering a story, it’s the avuncular, sentimental, self-described “luckiest SOB in the world” giving us his take on things. Sometimes, from his tone alone, we can tell when he likes something (baseball) or when he’s not happy with something (genocide). This affect-laden delivery can be helpful and enjoyable.
I contend that one reason people love Stewart and Colbert is that their reactions to the nightly outrages in our world are expressed with the dismay and passion, through humor, that such events provoke in normal people. Simon practices this not through humor, but simply via his honest, folksy demeanor. Scott, and I’m guessing he never allows anyone to call him “Mr. Simon” (that’s his dad!), is clearly a genuinely great guy almost any NPR listener would love to have a beer with – including me so long as the drinking doesn’t take place in a sports bar and we can stay off the subject of sports.
Plus can anyone resist those puppy-dog eyes?!? Does he not perfectly resemble someone who’d think Obama’s use of the phrase “ass to kick” still qualifies as “locker room talk” from which children need to be protected in the year 2010?
But there are risks when a journalist/host wears his heart on his sleeve. The abandonment of the comforting myth of journalistic objectivity puts him in a foggy area along with Fox News. Are we hearing truth or spin? Another problem is that he risks alienating listeners who disagree with him. (Helen Thomas ring a bell?) He can avoid these pitfalls as long as he offers only studiously apolitical personal opinions. Scott has proved himself remarkably nimble in this regard, even with his dangerously prolific tweeting.
One of the many non-controversial opinions he has made pretty clear of late is his support for organized religion. This is not going to get him in much trouble in the USA, the most religious (by far) of all developed nations.
But it does have a tendency to annoy your humble, though easily annoyed, servant.
Take last Saturday’s Weekend Edition. Scott interviewed Christopher Hitchens, noted dipsophile, atheist and author of “God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything.”
One of the ways Scott injects his personality into the show is by including his personal opinions in introductions of interview subjects, which could otherwise be very dry Curriculum Vitae excerpts.
His introduction of Mr. Hitchens (who I’m guessing allows the honorific) proceeded thusly:
He’s been a socialist who found Margaret Thatcher sexy; defender of the war in Iraq among leftists, a supporter of gay rights among rightists, an eloquent atheist who devoutly believes in ideals, not just skepticism.
That last bit bears repeating: “an eloquent atheist who devoutly believes in ideals, not just skepticism.” There’s quite a lot of subtext buried in that seemingly innocuous aside, especially in the context of Simon’s previous utterances (or silences) on the subject of religion. Simon employs the word “devout” in conjunction with atheism. This is a lazy and intentionally obnoxious category error frequently indulged in by irrationalists; kissing cousins with the meaningless expression “atheist fundamentalist”. The attempted juxtaposition of opposites pretends that skepticism is not, in and of itself, a laudable ideal but is instead a flaw of character whose redemption requires the leavening of ideals. Exactly which ideals are, as usual, not specified, and the stochastic menagerie of worldviews Mr. Hitchens has adopted, from sexy Cuban Communism to bellicose neocon paranoia, is too peculiar to be endorsed by anyone else. No, this is naked belief in belief, which I have mentioned before. To be a good person it doesn’t matter what you believe, as long as you believe in six impossible things before breakfast. It doesn’t matter which designer’s clothes you think the nude emperor is wearing, as long as you believe him to be gloriously arrayed.
But I have some news for you, Scott, delivered in my own inimitable style: skepticism is an ideal.
It may be the best of all ideals because it guards against any of the others, including baseball and genocide, gaining too much power over the mind of man.