The 2012 Republican Cadidates:
I’ve been wracking my brain trying to figure out why responsible news orgs like NPR and NYT are so itchy for the Iowa caucus (and straw poll before those) results. They’ve created endless coverage of the various Republican primary candidates, who increasingly resemble the nutty villains from the campy old Batman TV show with Adam West, as they wend their smarmy ways through every barn, outhouse, and corndog-extrusion facility in the state. The press does this in spite of the fact that responsible people, including Jon Stewart, keep pointing out that the results are meaningless in almost every way that matters.
So why do they do it? I think I figured it out the two reasons,
First things first. Iowa is first. The press loves “breaking” news, and there’s no breaking election news like the “first” primary-ish event.
Second, and this is more important, by making such a big deal about the Iowa caucuses the press actually causes the Iowa results to matter. Think about it. Who would care about the Iowa pseudo-primaries if the press didn’t give them wall-to-wall coverage? Conversely you might care about the Daytona Beach Seniors-Only Bridge Club’s choice of candidate if the press jabbered about it 10 hours a day.
Choosing something silly and making it important gives the press a kind of agency. They become the story. The story is not the results themselves, the story is the amount of attention the press focuses on the results.
And we’re all pretty tired of it, except of course for some members of the tiny and pointless demographic that actually takes part in the caucuses. Oh well, just another clownish, predictable aspect of our increasingly cartoonish and alienating electoral process.