Days of our Lives
Speaking of “on a Friday”, what is it with local and national NPR hosts telling us, every few minutes, what day of the week it is? Is it because a lot of the listening audience resides in “memory care” apartments?
This happens enough that, sort of like the “give us a sense” style of interviewing, I am convinced it is some kind of “best practice” enforced by policy and not just a fad.
I’m no Pope Gregory XIII, but I am usually pretty on top of what day I’m having a case of or humping over or thanking God that it is. I’d like to humbly suggest that you guys go all the way and tell us the date. Try “it’s Fridy the 18th” instead of the truly useless “on a Friday, it’s Morning Edition” or “good Friday morning to you.”
Either that or add even more tautological information so we can all meditate on what it means to be told things we already think by the journalists we choose to listen to. “Here on Earth, just like yesterday, it’s Morning Edition.” “Reality is comprehensible by applying reason to the information detected with the human sensorium, and it’s All Things Considered.”
Speaking of days, does anyone inside NPR or out actually know what the hell “Weekends at All Things Considered ” means? I can’t parse it. What was wrong with Weekend Edition Saturday/Sunday? I smell a committee.
Just a brief item to note that the guys and ghouls at “Story Corpse” have again incremented their body count and the world’s collective misery. Today’s heart-soup immersion blender’s victim was canine, which at least shakes it up a little.
I think the producers over there dream of a day when every death of every beloved person, animal, or object with great sentimental value can make the whole world cry. These stories are, as we are constantly reminded, archived in the library of congress, so they can make the space aliens who’ll be sifting through the wreckage of our civilization in a few years cry too.
I can find one positive note: at least the pun-loving Keeper landed a job after the regrettable cancellation of Tales From the Crypt.
There was a pretty good piece by David Folkenflik today dissecting the press coverage of Notre Dame’s girlfriend-gate. At one point he spoke of the problem of how much the reporters wanted the story to be true (like the one about Saddam’s WMDs I suppose).
Let’s think about that statement. The reporters wanted a young, football-star-beloved woman to have died of cancer long before her time? That really helps me understand Story Gore’s morbid editorial bias.
I’ve noticed that journalists tellingly universally loathe the preachy, shallow character-filled Sorkin series “The Newsroom”. I love it. It’s almost like “Airbag Moments” the tv show. It takes the media to the woodshed weekly by doing what Folkenflik does, only in narrative form. It Monday-morning (“On a Monday…”) quarterbacks the news. It’s one big thought experiment about, knowing what we know now, how should the press have handled big events in recent history. Who else is even having this conversation in this way? The Daily Show last week even expressed a devout wish that the show depicted a journalistic drive that actually existed. In reality there isn’t enough money in profit-driven journalism for the logistics of investigative reporting about things less interesting but more important than gridiron paramour three-hankies.
The more vital question for reporters, I suppose, is whether or not the platonic ideal of reportage Sorkin tries to model would have made any real difference. What if the answer to that is no?
As punishment, anyone who reported about the Notre Dame story has to watch a “Love Story” / “Brian’s Song” double feature tonight. I’m assuming the Story Corps folks were already planning to because, you know, it’s Friday!
Speaking of unpleasant stories the media wants badly to be true, NPR loves the “Military Veterans Aren’t Getting The Support They Deserve and it’s the VA’s Fault” headline. I can’t recall a single positive NPR story about the Veterans Administration. I happen to know that the VA, especially the health care delivery side known as the VHA, not only delivers a lot of great care, but also delivers it in ways that are years and sometimes decades ahead of the private sector. Computerized patient record keeping is a powerful example of this. Given how many stories NPR does about the tragicomic struggles of the private sector with this technology you’d think they’d cover how the public sector already nailed it.
Something else the press usually misses is that a large number of VA employees are themselves, by mandate, for better and for worse, Veterans. This is especially true in the VBA, the branch that determines what benefits Veterans receive, and the recipient of the most frequent and bitter excoriations. By policy the VA hires some of these Veterans preferentially over non-Veterans who might be more qualified. (Not every Veteran is an angel straight from heaven, and that should not be a controversial sentiment.) So please be aware that when you criticize the VA you are criticizing a whole bunch of Veterans many of whom are working hard and some of whom are hardly working.
We can all agree that many Veterans do need and deserve more services than they are getting, but journalists need to stop acting like the reason is some faceless implacable bureaucracy. Like most things, it comes down to money and logistics (sound familiar?), not a lack of desire on the part of the VA to serve the Veterans.
On a local note: please keep in mind, NHPR, there are good economic reasons why there’s no full VA hospital in your state. Politicians and scoundrels love to talk about how much they care about Veterans, but forcing the VA to waste money on a facility that won’t have enough patients to stay in business or provide a full range of services does not serve the only constituencies that matter, Veterans and taxpayers. Between the Boston area, Maine, and Vermont, northern New England is as well served as makes economic sense. If you’re concerned about drive times, talk to Veterans who live in far flung towns in hypertrophied western states. This whole “New Hampshire needs a VA” thing is just political grandstanding and cap-feather acquisition. So in spite of your knee-jerk sentimentality and desire for the big bad VA narrative, please add some more balance to your coverage of this.
On a personal note, it’s good to be back.